aptitudetests4me.com
Aptitude Tests 4 Me


bulletPassage Reading

bulletVerbal Logic

bulletNon Verbal Logic

bulletNumerical Logic

bulletData Interpretation

bulletReasoning

bulletAnalytical Ability

bulletBasic Numeracy

bulletAbout Us

bulletContact

bulletPrivacy Policy

bulletGoogle Privacy & Terms

bulletSite Map Page

Passage Reading and English Comprehension

It was once assumed that all living things could be divided into two fundamental and exhaustive categories. Multicellular plants and animals, as well as many unicellular organisms, are eukaryotic—their large, complex cells have a well-formed nucleus and many organelles. On the other hand, the true bacteria are prokaryotic cell, which are simple and lack a nucleus. The distinction between eukaryotes and bacteria, initially defined in terms of subcellular structures visible with a microscope, was ultimately carried to the molecular level. Here prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have many features in common. For instance, they translate genetic information into proteins according to the same type of genetic coding. But even where the molecular processes are the same, the details in the two forms are different and characteristic of the respective forms. For example, the amino acid sequences of various enzymes tend to be typically prokaryotic or eukaryotic. The differences between the groups and the similarities within each group made it seem certain to most biologists that the tree of life had only two stems. Moreover, arguments pointing out the extent of both structural and functional differences between eukaryotes and true bacteria convinced many biologists that the precursors of the eukaryotes must have diverged from the common ancestor before the bacteria arose.

Although much of this picture has been sustained by more recent research, it seems fundamentally wrong in one respect. Among the bacteria, there are organisms that are significantly different both from the cells of eukaryotes and from the true bacteria, and it now appears that there are three stems in the tree of life. New techniques for determining the molecular sequence of the RNA of organisms have produced evolutionary information about the degree to which organisms are related, the time since they diverged from a common ancestor, and the reconstruction of ancestral versions of genes. These techniques have strongly suggested that although the true bacteria indeed form a large coherent group, certain other bacteria, the archaebacteria, which are also prokaryotes and which resemble true bacteria, represent a distinct evolutionary branch that far antedates the common ancestor of all true bacteria.

171. The passage is primarily concerned with

(a) detailing the evidence that has led most biologists to replace the trichotomous picture of living organisms with a dichotomous one
(b) outlining the factors that have contributed to the current hypothesis concerning the number of basic categories of living organisms
(c) evaluating experiments that have resulted in proof that the prokaryotes are more ancient than had been expected
(d) summarizing the differences in structure and function found among true bacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes

172. According to the passage, investigations of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells at the molecular level supported the conclusion that

(a) most eukaryotic organisms are unicellular
(b) complex cells have well-formed nuclei
(c) prokaryotes and eukaryotes form two fundamental categories
(d) subcellular structures are visible with a microscope

173. According to the passage, which of the following statements about the two-category hypothesis is likely to be true?

(a) It is promising because it explains the presence of true bacteria-like organisms such as organelles in eukaryotic cells.
(b) It is promising because it explains why eukaryotic cells, unlike prokaryotic cells, tend to form multicellular organisms.
(c) It is flawed because it fails to account for the great variety among eukaryotic organisms.
(d) It is flawed because it fails to recognize an important distinction among prokaryotes.

174. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following have recently been compared in order to clarify the fundamental classifications of living things?

(a) The genetic coding in true bacteria and that in other prokaryotes
(b) The organelle structures of archaebacteria, true bacteria, and eukaryotes
(c) The cellular structures of multicellular organisms and unicellular organisms
(d) The molecular sequences in eukaryotic RNA, true bacterial RNA, and archaebacterial RNA

175. If the “new techniques” were applied in studies of biological classifications other than bacteria, which of the following is most likely?

(a) Some of those classifications will have to be reevaluated.
(b) Many species of bacteria will be reclassified.
(c) It will be determined that there are four main categories of living things rather than three.
(d) It will be found that true bacteria are much older than eukaryotes.

176. According to the passage, researchers working under the two-category hypothesis were correct in thinking that

(a) prokaryotes form a coherent group
(b) the common ancestor of all living things had complex properties
(c) eukaryotes are fundamentally different from true bacteria
(d) true bacteria are just as complex as eukaryotes

177. All of the following statements are supported by the passage EXCEPT:

(a) True bacteria form a distinct evolutionary group.
(b) Amino acid sequences of enzymes are uniform for eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms.
(c) Archaebacteria are prokaryotes that resemble true bacteria.
(d) True bacteria and eukaryotes employ similar types of genetic coding.

178. The author’s attitude toward the view that living things are divided into three categories is best described as one of

(a) tentative acceptance
(b) mild skepticism
(c) limited denial
(d) studious criticism

TOTAL

Detailed Solution




Download Free EBooks for GMAT, GRE, ACT, SAT, LSAT, MCAT etc.

1. Passage Reading 2. Verbal Logic 3. Non Verbal Logic 4. Numerical Logic

5. Data Interpretation 6. Reasoning 7. Analytical Ability 8. Basic Numeracy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140
141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160
161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180
181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200
201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240
241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260
261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280
281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300
301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320
321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340
341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360
361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380
381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400
401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419

Tell Your Freind

Your Name:
Your Friends Email Address:
Your Friends Name: